Why Location Matters

No Quarry on Homestead is not opposed to limestone quarrying as an industry.

The right question is not whether limestone can be extracted — it is where extraction can happen with the least harm to communities and ecosystems.


🏗️ What Makes a Site Lower-Impact?

A responsible site evaluation would consider the following criteria:

Criterion The Little River Valley Site Lower-Impact Alternative Would Have
Residential proximity Borders established neighborhoods; 0.5–1 mi from schools and hospitals Rural or agricultural buffer; >3 miles from residential, schools, hospitals
Wetland overlap Within/adjacent to Little River floodplain and NWI-mapped wetlands Upland site; no mapped wetlands within operation buffer
Watershed sensitivity Little River → downstream urban communities Isolated drainage; no sole-source aquifer or urban watershed at risk
Karst geology risk Limestone karst terrain with sinkhole and groundwater exposure Non-karst bedrock; low sinkhole risk; contained groundwater
Traffic routing Routes heavy trucks through residential streets and near hospital access roads Direct access to US-30, I-69, US-24, or US-33 without residential streets
Limestone availability Present — hence the proposal Must still overlie viable limestone deposit

Meeting all six criteria would represent a meaningfully lower-impact choice than the current proposed site.


📍 Geographic Areas Worth Evaluating

Indiana is one of the nation’s largest producers of limestone aggregate. Significant limestone deposits exist across much of northern and central Indiana, including areas with far fewer residential and environmental conflicts than the Little River Valley.

Nearby counties with limestone geology and lower-conflict land use patterns:

  • Northern Allen County / DeKalb County — lower residential density north of Fort Wayne; more agricultural/industrial corridor character
  • Huntington County / Wabash County — limestone geology present; more rural land use; existing industrial precedent in places distant from sensitive wetlands
  • Wells County — agricultural character; less dense residential pattern than SW Allen County
  • Grant County — limestone geology; existing quarry precedent in lower-conflict areas

This is not an exhaustive list. A full siting analysis would require:

  1. USGS Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS) review for confirmed limestone deposits
  2. Indiana Geological & Water Survey formation mapping
  3. USFWS National Wetlands Inventory overlay for candidate areas
  4. Allen County and adjacent county parcel and zoning data
  5. Population density and residential proximity analysis

🧭 What We’re Asking For

We are asking Allen County and the developer to conduct a transparent alternatives analysis as part of the rezoning process — a standard practice in environmental impact review that asks: Is this the best possible location, or just the most convenient one for the applicant?

The community deserves an answer to that question before an 80–100 year commitment is made to this land.


  • The Threat — What is proposed and where
  • Science & Data — Research on environmental and health impacts
  • Maps — Spatial data on the proposed site
  • Take Action — How to make your voice heard